My Philosophy change is a challenge Essay Example for Free

My Philosophy switch over is a dispute EssayI. IntroductionMan necessarily philosophy in order to be able to think, minute and live accordingly. It is a basic blueprint of a mans actions from thinking, to interacting with others. The only thing that is unvarying is change.This saying is indeed true especi anyy in the Philippine Education System. For e rattling change enforced lies challengers on the part of the classroom t each(prenominal)ers who portrays varied roles. The rapid changes in the world have made platform design even more than difficult. to be globally competitiveII. Aims of my Philosophy chosenThere is a need to revise the syllabus from time to time for us to suit the needs of time. We should go on with the flow of life and we should revise it now because curriculum in the past is non anymore very centerive or suited for todays generationAs pro active separate I consider Change as a challenge and non a threat. Meeting late challenges require the oppor tunity to take risks and try new ideas. As a learning individual change is inevitable to ensure the needs of society. In a fast changing society education is nonp aril way to connect oneself to the past and to project into the future and therefore aims in Philosophy should be considered.III. lineament of Philosophy chosen to EducationEducation and philosophy are closely tied together twain are associated with computer programme line, learning, and discovering. Philosophy is more of an all-encompassing part of life, though education is a more detail form of it. Due to the contributions of philosophers over the centuries, education has developed into the powerful tool that it is today. Without philosophy, education would essentially not exist. That said importance of philosophy in education is in fact the foundation in which all academic teaching and intellectual learning is built off.IV. Role of Philosophy to the content development1. It guides everyone to formulate collabora tively for school change to meet the learners diverse needs 2. It serves as a fomite to open new ideas for positive outcomes 3 It streng thens the goals on meeting challenges for a fully functional learner.words is dynamic as well as the curriculum. We have different curriculum in the past and in the present. We are now in a globally competitive world. A world that also needs competitive teachers and students. So, how exit you become competitive if your curriculum is traditional? And is not aware of the new trends of teaching today?Students now are fond of using electronic computers. They pass on probably choose going to the computer shop than going to school. As a teacher, what will you do? Dont be a boring teacher An effective way of solving this kind of phenomena is that the teachers must use technology in teaching. commit it as your partner in delivering a lesson so that the students will not get bored. Make a teaching-learning change lively and meaningful.Teaching and lear ning give life and meaning to the curriculum because this is the process wherein the teacher and the students interact with each other interchangeably or vice versa. If there is an effective teaching-learning process, its really a big help to the curriculum. Its a big honor because each complements and supplements each other. The value placed in teaching will reap the same value in learning. Thus, a good curriculum can be judged by the kind if teaching and the quality of learning derived from it.The near important thing to keep in mind about strategic content development is that its truly an improvisational process. The reason why you want to identify as many viable options for potentially singular content is simple Youll al close to certainly need to make adjustments on the process, and its easier to do that when youve already identified alternatives. So, the final aspect of strategic content development is to constantly evaluate what happened along the way, and why. The most val uable lessons are often found in the things that didnt work, so treat it all as a learning experience that keeps your content constantly fresh and worth talking about.V. Significant effect of this curriculum development to the current trends in attaining universal truth in Educational ProcessIn 2012 Depeds K 12 Program goes full blast. Brother Armin Luistro has described the implementation of the universal primitive or pre-school education in the Philippines as the defining moment in the administration of President Aquino as it seeks to implement reforms with deep impact on the welfare of Filipino children and the youth. DepEds enhanced curriculum aims to meet the overall objective of preparing children for productive work, either as employees or entrepreneurs, while maintaining its current academic campaignIt seems that the President is rushing this program before his term ends. If this program is not implemented well, we might not achieve our real objectives. And all we have don e is to disrupt the whole system. Changing programs and implementing new ones is not cheap. Will the next President change the system again?In a survey conducted by SWS from Aug. 24 to 27 last year showed growing acceptability of the key features of the K-12 program compared to survey results in March 2012. About 72 percent of Filipino adults gestate that K-12 will give students more satisfactory cognition and preparation for work and college compared to those who cobblers lasted 10 years of basic education, garnering a net military rank of +48, up from +35 last March.The percentage of Filipinos who believe that more students will be encouraged to finish the two-year SHS because it is equivalent to two years of college hit 69 percent, or a 10- point adjoin from 59 percent in March.The results showed that 68 percent of Filipinos with a net rating of +39 believe that more students will finish SHS even with the additional cost and number of years because K-12 graduate will be bett er prepared for work, higher education, and business. The results of the survey didnt even reach 75% which means about are not amenable to the new program. Although the selling point of K to 12 is the assurance that graduates of higher-ranking High School will be able to work immediately, even before or without pursuance a college degreeUnder certain circumstances, it is possible to revise only the high school curriculum. stock-still in this case, we have to wait until those already in First Year have finished stern Year (under the present system).After drawing up a curriculum on paper (including such(prenominal) things as expected competencies, prerequisites, qualifications, learning areas, scope, coverage, and outcomes), curriculum designers have to think about the textbooks and other instructional materials that will have to be created for the new or revised subjects. Although teacher training is a separate process, curriculum designers also have to give pointers on how teac hers should be trained to handle the subjects. There also has to be some way to determine if and when the curriculum needs to be revised this is called program assessment or evaluation.Because of abrupt implementation teachers are really having a hard time coping with the changes not to allude the lack of classrooms, instructional materials and the real physical situation of the learners. If the government can financially sustain the program without adding too much burden on parents, its worth giving it a try.However, nowadays, most of the students are the happy-go-lucky types who do not regard education as their priority. Theyd rather bum more or less in malls or stay glued to computers. As a result, most graduates are half-baked, who cant even write or speak good English, unlike the students of yesteryears. Before, a Grade 6 pupils then could already teach. An additional two years to the basic education curriculum could spell two more years of burden to poor parents who could ha rdly send their children to school.Before full implementation, there usually is a year-long pilot to debug the curriculum, as well as a longer transition period deep down which some students will be following the old curriculum and some following the new.Curriculum should not only focus on the tools necessary to develop reasoned and logical construction of new knowledge in our various fields of study, but also should aggressively cultivate a culture that nurtures creativeness in all of our learners. This point seems particularly important.